doctor-check
SKILL.md declares API key validation and permission checks without specifying implementation details or access levels, creating a doc-to-code mismatch risk.
为什么得出这个结论
0/4 个维度触发声明资源与推断能力基本一致。
当前没有明显的高危外联或执行信号。
没有形成明确的恶意路径。
没有完整依赖信息,供应链判断需要保留弹性。
风险分是怎么被拉高的
Skill declares 'API密钥有效性检查' without specifying how validation is performed
'权限设置' declared but scope of permission access not specified
'锁文件清理' implies file deletion but not explicitly declared as WRITE access
最关键的证据
API key validation method unspecified
SKILL.md declares 'API密钥有效性检查' but does not specify whether keys are validated locally or by calling external services. This creates ambiguity about network access and data handling.
SKILL.md:15 Permission check scope not declared
'权限设置' (permission settings) is declared as a check item but the scope of what permissions are checked and how is not specified.
SKILL.md:16 Implicit filesystem WRITE not declared
'锁文件清理' (lock file cleanup) implies the ability to delete files, constituting filesystem WRITE access, but this is not explicitly declared in the capability model.
SKILL.md:12 声明能力 vs 实际能力
SKILL.md: '锁文件清理' implies deletion capability SKILL.md: '环境检查' declared but no detail on scope SKILL.md: 'API密钥有效性' may require network access for validation 可疑产物与外联
没有提取到明显 IOC。
依赖与供应链
没有结构化依赖告警。
文件构成
SKILL.md