ai-customer-service-automation
The skill declares extensive AI automation capabilities but contains no actual implementation code—the only files are documentation (SKILL.md) and a package.json referencing a non-existent index.js entry point.
Why this conclusion was reached
0/4 dimensions flaggedDeclared resources and inferred behavior are broadly aligned.
1 lower-risk artifacts were extracted and still need context.
There is no explicit malicious chain in the report.
Dependency information is incomplete, so supply-chain confidence stays limited.
What drove the risk score up
SKILL.md claims AI automation, sentiment analysis, ticket systems, multi-channel support but no actual code exists
package.json declares main: 'index.js' but the file does not exist in the package
SKILL.md is 80% marketing content (pricing, ROI, testimonials) with no technical implementation details
Most important evidence
Declared functionality has no implementation
SKILL.md claims AI-powered features (sentiment analysis, ticket systems, knowledge base sync, multi-channel support) but no source code, scripts, or entry point exists. The only declared entry 'index.js' referenced in package.json is missing.
SKILL.md:1 Marketing content masquerading as technical documentation
SKILL.md contains pricing tables, ROI calculations, customer testimonials, and sales copy. A legitimate skill would include actual code examples, API documentation, or technical implementation details.
SKILL.md:1 Declared capability vs actual capability
No code files present No code files present No scripts/entry points exist No code files present No code files present No code files present No code files present No code files present Suspicious artifacts and egress
Dependencies and supply chain
There are no structured dependency warnings.
File composition
SKILL.md