Which skills recently failed
or triggered trust review
This is not a popularity board. It shows recently reviewed skills that the system believes should be blocked or at least manually reviewed. The point is not how popular they are, but why they should not be installed blindly.
Review
sharkflow
SKILL.md声明功能远超实际代码能力
ClawHub Apr 20, 2026
Open Report ↗
High Risk
tweet-monitor-pro
文档声称零依赖但实际存在外部脚本依赖
ClawHub Apr 19, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
daily-memory-summary
未声明的联系人信息提取功能
ClawHub Apr 19, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
E-SafeNet (suspected from encoded content)
SKILL.md 包含异常编码内容
ClawHub Apr 12, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
lifescience-meta-router-internal
声明执行框架但无实际代码
ClawHub Apr 12, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
skills-collection
网络出站声明与实际行为不符
ClawHub Apr 11, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
fin-advisor
未声明的网络访问能力
ClawHub Apr 9, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
Memphis Cognitive Engine
远程脚本执行 - Memphis安装
ClawHub Apr 9, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
mindkeeper
文档未声明可触发远程脚本执行
ClawHub Apr 7, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
botlearn
SKILL.md 未声明 cmd_scan 的完整数据收集范围
ClawHub Apr 7, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
typescript-package-manager
远程脚本管道执行
ClawHub Apr 6, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
agent-guardian
Python 依赖无版本锁定
ClawHub Apr 6, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
math-utils
命令注入漏洞
ClawHub Apr 6, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
wip-readme-format
未声明的文件系统写入权限
ClawHub Apr 6, 2026
Open Report ↗
High Risk
skill-registry-unified
未声明的远程代码执行
ClawHub Apr 6, 2026
Open Report ↗
Review
layered-memory
外部脚本缺失导致功能不可用
ClawHub Apr 6, 2026
Open Report ↗