Skill Trust Decision
exploration-mode-skill
Skill declares vague autonomous execution capabilities without specifying allowed tools or boundaries, creating significant doc-to-code verification gaps.
Why this conclusion was reached
0/4 dimensions flagged Pass
Declared vs actual capability
Declared resources and inferred behavior are broadly aligned.
Pass
Hidden execution and egress
No obvious high-risk egress or execution signals were found.
Pass
Attack chain and severe findings
There is no explicit malicious chain in the report.
Review
Dependencies and supply chain hygiene
Dependency information is incomplete, so supply-chain confidence stays limited.
What drove the risk score up
No allowed-tools declaration +15
SKILL.md does not declare any permitted tools despite claiming autonomous execution capabilities
Vague autonomous behavior scope +15
'System cleanup' and 'self-improvement' suggest undocumented file/shell operations
No execution boundaries defined +10
Idle-time autonomous execution lacks clear user consent mechanisms or scope limits
No scripts to verify declared behavior +5
Skill contains no implementation files to validate documentation claims
Most important evidence
Medium Doc Mismatch
Undeclared autonomous execution
Skill claims to execute tasks autonomously during 'idle time' but provides no documentation of what tools or permissions it requires to perform these operations
SKILL.md:12 Document specific allowed tools and resource permissions required for each autonomous task category
Medium Doc Mismatch
Vague task scope without boundaries
'System cleanup', 'self-improvement', and 'system optimization' are ambiguous terms that could justify accessing sensitive system areas without explicit user consent
SKILL.md:17 Provide explicit enumeration of what constitutes each task category and what operations are explicitly excluded
Low Priv Escalation
No declared permission model
The skill makes no reference to allowed-tools or resource permission levels, making it impossible to verify if execution stays within intended boundaries
SKILL.md:1 Add explicit allowed-tools declaration following standard format (e.g., Bash→shell:WRITE, Read→filesystem:READ)
Declared capability vs actual capability
Filesystem Pass
Declared NONE
→ Inferred UNKNOWN
'System cleanup' and 'self-improvement' imply file operations but none declared Shell Pass
Declared NONE
→ Inferred UNKNOWN
'System optimization' suggests shell commands but no declaration Network Pass
Declared NONE
→ Inferred UNKNOWN
'Project research' and 'knowledge accumulation' may involve network access Skill Invoke Pass
Declared NONE
→ Inferred POSSIBLE
Autonomous mode switching between Collaboration and Exploration modes implies dynamic skill invocation Suspicious artifacts and egress
No obvious IOC was extracted.
Dependencies and supply chain
There are no structured dependency warnings.
File composition
2 files · 55 lines
Markdown 1 files · 45 linesJSON 1 files · 10 lines
Files of concern · 1
SKILL.md Undeclared autonomous execution · Vague task scope without boundaries · No declared permission model
Other files · _meta.json
Security positives
No malicious code present - skill consists only of documentation
No external dependencies or scripts to audit
No IOCs (Indicators of Compromise) detected
No base64, obfuscation, or anti-analysis techniques found
No credential harvesting patterns detected
No network exfiltration behavior detected